Ambition is not the same as greed. In their desire for accumulation and power, human beings are capable of hoarding at the expense of others and even denying the needs of others, letting everything they possess and will never use rot or be lost, even if others have nothing and die. This reality also generates hatred among the oppressed towards those who free themselves or propose freedom, not towards the oppressors and the greedy. The oppressed, in their desperation, want to see everything burn; they cannot understand with empathy the absolute need for a break towards liberation (rebellion, a dangerous word in times of censorship), and of course, they take and steal the phrases of humanity and fraternity to confuse and guarantee their own subordination. It is dangerous to life itself, but they don't care. She decided to disappear. Well, in a way. She was there, but she didn't respond. She read what he wrote, followed what he did, and subtly let him know she was there. In her ego, she thought that he would be after her forever, but his time had passed. He, of course, thought about her, but not in the way she imagined everything was. It wasn't a question of improvement but of tiredness and distraction. And that distraction, little by little, turned into other interests. In others, different from her. But she didn't know that.
But it is easy to blame things (not those who invent them) and to blame the inanimate or the divine, but not to assume and recognize. Even when it is possible to decide to break up, contrary to fear, it is preferable to blame the strange, the external, that which has nothing to do with it because it is preferable to recognize who that is. Digital technology and AI itself, invented by men, are perfect for assuming all the blame and guaranteeing the continuity of oppression and surrender. Of course, boneheadedness guarantees the search for guilt, even in objects. Seeing if she responded to him on any social network was already a morning habit. To see if she had updated one of her videos or if she simply checked on him with some lost photo. In some way, all of this did not allow him to break away, but it was because he did not want to. What did he want? He did not know; thinking about her was still an addiction. For him, it was clearer what he did not want, and just like her since her simultaneous lover with him, or her second after him, she did not care, except for her own ambitions paid for by her sexual passion, justified by her needs. In any case, she enjoyed it and made others enjoy it. That was the difference between her and other women.
Fueled by fear and hatred, opportunity (and the associated opportunism) helps this shamelessness and irresponsibility. Not for nothing, in civilization, those who guarantee their supremacy and power are those who manage to take advantage of others via technology. So, the individual can reason, and to do so correctly, he must know, and the acquisition of that knowledge (not an accumulation of information) can be openly discussed; it must be done that way to ensure that responsibility and non-neutrality in full conscienceless. The latter is achieved not only with clear knowledge but also with a little human values, not prices. He thought he gave value to everything, everyone, and his friends, but in reality, he marked them in prices and costs. His values were supported by what he coveted and what he collected. But his money was insufficient to buy or obtain something that would allow him to be. His whole life was determined by possessions and havings, not by real achievements. He was not someone he was getting. And that did not allow him to be delighted or sleep. What bothered him most was the resilience of those from whom he took things and people. And also how his money lost value when he bought useless things, especially because there was always someone with something more. Much more than he had. Unbearable, but that showed that he had something, but he couldn't be. Nobody. Nothing."



