Aggressiveness

"The citizen is so accustomed to violence that it is not distinguished but rewarded, and it is more common in those in whom they supposedly pray since their faith is based on fear and hatred. Not in empathy, so in his books is this writing. Aggressiveness itself is power, and power is admirable. Those evolutionary advantages given by compassion, collaboration and the reward for doing things well have been lost in human societies that praise property and ego. So, humans who want to establish links and conversations are penalized because of supposed faintness. We kissed, but it didn't go any further. We made love when you were looking to fall in love again. We were friends, but now I am a nuisance wanting to leave so badly. It is a pity. We made love; you had your lovers and boyfriends, and I always hoped to be your friend. And even though to betray, it is necessary to be a friend, the betrayal will not come from my side. And from there, the attempt to speak. But yeah. It is time for silence against your aggressiveness.

Of course, more than a right, it exits a duty of violence. However, the motivations and reasons are not possible to justify that duty. Despite if, it is possible to find many explanations to reason about nonviolence, especially in times when survival is if peace is achieved. Thus, aggressiveness has become a convenience to deploy fear and languishment, so people move away and do not build anything for those whose oppression and greed suit them. It's the second beer, Sinatra is not so convenient, and Belafonte could be better for this Friday night. After several days of disconnecting from everything that frustrates him, and maybe the list of things to do, that is finally finished or forgotten. Oblivion would be the best - he said, seeing the 7:30 p.m. in the wall clock - but forgetting is not a matter of choice despite all the help phrases posted everywhere. Now is the time for Amstrong and a third beer.

How, then, justify this right to aggressiveness? There really isn't. It is impossible if the reason is based on all the facts and dependencies of the action. However, in the consequences (like roughness itself, yes), the motivations or excuses can be argued with all existing evidence. So, it is possible to think of a non-violent world so that reason and empathy lay the necessary foundations for social construction. But the phrase and the speech can be beautiful and confusing, so the how is difficult or unclear, and that is where the difficulty of the question lies. That night, she understood that she had to look for him before it was too late. She looked at her phone. A few days ago, she received a message from him but no longer saw his profile picture. He felt anguish. He had never felt it. Her arrogance took him for granted that he would always be there, which wasn't the case anymore. How many days had passed? Two days from that message, but six years from the first kiss, from the first day she had sex with him, and two years and a few months since the last one. Friday night, a tear ran down her face. What had she done? It was too late, and she had to decide: start a journey for him or not.

The evolutionary advantage to going beyond survival and the long-term rewards, not for pleasure, are those that go towards doing things based on human values and not greed. It is not brutality or aggressiveness. After so much time and in this civilization, humanity must understand that and in that understanding, make it a common practice. In everyday life, that aggressiveness does not really give power. It only hurts. And it is in the every day that civilization is assembled, not in the exceptional. He had never felt the weight of all these years on him before, and he had not reached half of what he aspired to live. By taking that shot of whiskey, he understood that his life was a succession of meaningless repetitions that had to end, not his life, but these insufferable cycles.  Of course, the whiskey had nothing to do with that lucidity, but it was perfect to accompany the decision. The drums of distant tribes told him that here, there was plenty."