"Little and flexible morality. The worst is when the intimity is a public issue, a subject to be judged by them who believe themselves better than others. And the end is only appearance in a world accustomed to classify the people in good or bad. So, memories about the level of straightness is relative and that has not nothing to do with what is known a integrity. Hypocrisy is sufficient to perform the best paper: a beautiful person.
Thousands of phrases to dozens of letters about the right state of the acceptation. Yes, there are sense about the selfish reality of the solitude and power of the non recognize temporality. Millions of rules, an only reason. The brave man is dead for this story. And the same brave man refuses to be eliminated as part of an argument to finish after the next five pages of lamentations in a finish point to start a silence. The silence of the end.
Pleasure or pain? It is not a question of an only and true answer. In the little and flexible morality, the condition to justify any revenge is the sensation to adjust an imaginary balance with the good and the bad. Most part of the time tilt ti towards what we think is good, because a real adjust is to be something good and bad. Real. And when it ceases to exist in real, the better decision is simple: leave and go of the story, accept the silence of the end. Recognize that we are bad enough to follow with the same theatre, and simply disappear with the verdict of the others, same if it is not accepted. Just go.
How far do you insist? As far as it can be understood. However, it is not possible to be wise enough to arrive to describe with the correct words and the correct models in the mind the reasons... and in any case, it is possible to reach a judgement. Believe in arrogance to justify the selfhood. Integrity is about to be in consequence. Coherence in discourse and life, without rhetoric and rules. Then, it is not possible to understand. It is not good or bad insist. Just, the moment to go was yesterday.
No comments:
Post a Comment