"The dark side of the stories are not surprising. There are places that their history is a combination between horror and faith. The wrong way of the faith. The problem with the history is the official redaction and acknowledgments. True history, without define the motivations and interpretations, must be acts and not motivations. However, inspirational authors which write about acts and facts are enough of.
If I write about my history, the history of my neighbors, of my lovers and adventures, I don't write about my disappointments and failures with candor. sure, there will be a lot of omissions, and the fragmentation of stories, give only the appropriate version. However, when the story is the collective memory, not the result of the discussions, but the facts, acts, words and more of the time, without opinion, may be is more transparent.
However conveniences are real. Nicknames, superlatives, additions, expressions opinions are necessaries, the description from the convenience and since the time position support any modification in the version. And build, a sub-version. But the dark-side of the story is the non only the hidden truth behind the makeup, is the story with all the sentiments and all the positions involved. Facts simply. Acts really.
This week, I learned about all the stories. I'm think when the story grievance came. May be never. Almost not in a strict use of the mot "grievance". The assertion will be come of a different way to re-discuss or simply, the only way of the silence. When there are not nothing to say, the silence gives silence. "
No comments:
Post a Comment