"A touch. The simple word to say that it exists a spontaneous attraction between strangers. The touch, a Gallicism (Why not?), from French as lover language, comes from "touché", an expression of fencing (irony?) that could be interpreted as pain (eternal duality of love/war, pleasure/sorrow). As always, the feelings associated whit human interactions are the most tangible expression of the ambiguity.
Biologists have been characterized the situation in terms of pheromones and fertilization states (or procreation capabilities). However, is more complex than that, and if we turn to psychologists and sociologists, we can find explanations in the context of needs and social roles. In the end, we turn to a biological description of the sexual needs, not always to fertilize and procreate. The complexity of love is reduced to a finite series that can be resolved mathematically. A disappointed for many romantics, but a relief for everyone.
But humans do not like things simple, for this reason, silence exists in the "touche" moment. Indeed, all species woo. In both senses, to demonstrate power, good genetic material, force. The degree of success of demonstration could be measured as intelligence (and the time to reach as sensibility?). Also, the time of the relation in accordance with the compatibility one success has been achieved. Because one thing is to reach one time, but the other, remain more than once time. Being in love in the two senses.
Rejection of the second time is worst than the rejection of the bid. Seek to explain the unexplainable as we would like to hear. When the situation is simple. The "touch" does not exists because the curiosity or the original need was satisfied. Then, one-way attraction transforms love in obsession. Simple, as all the cruel truths."
No comments:
Post a Comment